8 Assets Wealthy Retirees Refuse to Own, and the Simpler Path That Protects Real Freedom

I watched a video from Cody Gunn, CFA, on eight assets that wealthy retirees often avoid. The point was not that every item on the list is always bad. The better point is that many things people call “assets” can quietly become liabilities once you account for cost, complexity, liquidity, and opportunity cost.

That matters because retirement is not just about owning more things. It is about having more freedom.

If any of these items are part of your financial picture, the question is not, “Is this good or bad?” The better question is, “Does this still support the life I am trying to build?”

That is where first-principles thinking helps.

Start by defining the word “asset”

Most people use the word asset too loosely.

A home can be an asset. A business can be an asset. A portfolio can be an asset. Even a collectible can be an asset in the technical sense.

But from a retirement planning perspective, the definition needs to be more disciplined.

An asset should preserve or increase purchasing power, improve flexibility, or support the lifestyle your income can sustain. After costs, taxes, fees, maintenance, depreciation, and lost opportunity, it should still move you closer to stability and freedom.

That is the test many “assets” fail.

The assumption is often, “This will appreciate,” or “This will make retirement more enjoyable.” Sometimes that is true. However, sometimes the opposite happens. The item creates another bill, another decision, another obligation, or another layer of complexity.

That is the real issue.

The eight items are really four categories

The video’s list can be organized into four practical groups.

1. Property traps

Timeshares, vacation homes, and recreational properties often begin with a lifestyle promise. The idea is simple: more memories, more access, more enjoyment.

The problem is that these assets often come with low liquidity, ongoing fees, maintenance, taxes, insurance, and limited flexibility. What looks like freedom can become a calendar obligation and a cash-flow commitment.

The question is not whether a vacation property can work. For some households, it can. The question is whether the true carry cost supports the retirement plan or competes with it.

2. Product complexity

Whole life insurance positioned primarily as an investment and certain high-fee annuities can create another challenge: complexity.

Insurance can serve a valid purpose. Annuities can solve specific planning problems. However, when products are purchased without clearly separating protection, income, fees, surrender terms, liquidity, and opportunity cost, the household may not understand what it owns.

That is a problem because retirement decisions need clarity.

Complexity is not automatically wrong. Unclear complexity is the concern.

3. Investment drag

Actively managed funds with elevated expense ratios need to earn their place. A higher cost structure means the investment has to overcome a larger hurdle before the client benefits.

That does not mean every active strategy is wrong. It means cost, tax efficiency, turnover, consistency, and fit should be evaluated against the role the investment is supposed to play.

In retirement, unnecessary drag matters. A small cost difference can become meaningful when withdrawals, taxes, and inflation are already pressuring the plan.

4. Cash-flow and depreciation leaks

Luxury vehicle leases and collectibles bought primarily for appreciation can create a different kind of problem.

They may feel manageable one decision at a time. However, they can quietly weaken liquidity, add recurring obligations, or tie up capital in assets that may not produce reliable economic value.

The issue is not enjoyment. The issue is alignment.

A retirement plan should leave room for enjoyment, but the lifestyle still has to be supported by income, liquidity, and long-term purchasing power.

Three questions to ask before holding or buying any “asset”

A practical review does not need to be complicated. Start with three questions.

• First, does this support a lifestyle aligned with current and future income?

• Second, does it strengthen or weaken income resilience and diversification?

• Third, are we making measurable progress, or is this item quietly working against us?

  
  

Those questions bring discipline to the decision. They shift the conversation away from status, sales language, or assumptions and back toward the numbers.

Use Liquidity, Safety, and Growth as the filter

Every holding should have a job.

Liquidity means access. If capital is needed, can you use it without delay, penalty, or a forced sale?

Safety means resilience. Does the holding reduce pressure on the plan, or does it add recurring costs, debt, maintenance, or risk?

Growth means long-term purchasing power. After fees, taxes, inflation, depreciation, and opportunity cost, is the asset likely helping the household move forward?

Many of the eight items fail because they violate one or more of these buckets. They may be illiquid when flexibility is needed. They may create ongoing costs that weaken safety. Or they may fail to produce enough return to justify the friction.

A simple review prompt

Here is a practical way to use the video as an audit tool.

List any items you own that match the categories above. Then estimate the true annual cost. Include fees, taxes, insurance, maintenance, debt payments, depreciation, and time required to manage it.

Next, ask what else that capital could be doing. Could it improve liquidity? Reduce pressure on income? Simplify the plan? Support a more diversified investment structure? Increase flexibility?

The goal is not to eliminate every enjoyable purchase. The goal is to make sure the things you own are not quietly owning your retirement.

Small, consistent adjustments can create more room over time. Less friction often means more flexibility. More flexibility often means better decisions.

The real retirement asset is freedom

Many pre-retirees and retirees discover too late that certain assets create the exact pressure they were trying to escape. More maintenance. More management. More bills. More complexity.

That is why the video’s message is useful.

You did not retire to get another job.

The goal is not more possessions. The goal is clearer ownership of the life your numbers can actually support.

As Cody Gunn put it, “You stop collecting things and you start collecting freedom.”

That is a better definition of wealth.

Disclosure - All written content on this site is for information purposes only. Opinions expressed herein are solely those of Core Wealth Consultants, LLC and our editorial staff. Material presented is believed to be from reliable sources, however, we make no representations as to its accuracy or completeness. All information and ideas should be discussed in detail with your individual adviser prior to implementation. Core Wealth Consultants, LLC a Registered Investment Advisor in the States of Florida, Indiana and Michigan. The presence of this web site shall in no way be construed or interpreted as a solicitation to sell or offer to sell investment advisory services to any residents of any State other than the States of Florida, Indiana, Michigan or where otherwise legally permitted. Content should not be viewed as an offer to buy or sell any of the securities mentioned or as legal or tax advice. You should always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. Core Wealth Consultants, LLC is not engaged in the practice of law. Hyperlinks on this website are provided as a convenience. We cannot be held responsible for information, services or products found on websites linked to ours. Diversification and asset allocation does not assure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment loss.